Solutions06 · Portfolios and insolvency
Liabilities, claims and litigation analytics.
Structuring of mass-litigation portfolios with clean data, indicators by claim and court and periodic BI reports, plus technical support to insolvency administrators in restructuring and insolvency proceedings.
Context
Turn scattered case data into a clear portfolio view.
Large companies carry portfolios of tens of thousands of repetitive cases spread across law firms and systems. Provisions are estimated by manual sampling, and settlement strategy does not distinguish claims, courts or claimant profiles.
We consolidate case data, standardise records and report by claim type, court and stage. Legal and finance teams use the results to assess provisions and settlements. We also organise and reconcile creditor claims for insolvency administrators.
Process
Six stages, from scattered data to recurring indicators.
Each cycle refreshes the same structure, so the portfolio can be compared over time.
- 01
Inventory
Case lists consolidated from law firms, internal systems and public sources.
Deliverable: consolidated inventory
- 02
Extraction
AI-assisted extraction of claim type, amounts, court, stage and outcome from the case files.
Deliverable: structured case base
- 03
Cleaning
Standardisation of names, courts and claim categories, with duplicates and gaps flagged.
Deliverable: data-quality report
- 04
Indicators
Outcomes, durations and amounts by claim, court, stage and law firm.
Deliverable: periodic BI report
- 05
Clusters
Cases grouped by risk profile to support provisions and settlement strategy.
Deliverable: risk clusters
- 06
Cycle
Periodic refresh with new cases and outcomes, with changes explained.
Deliverable: cycle report
Our approach
What changes when the portfolio is treated as data.
- 01
Built from the case files
Indicators come from the documents and public court data, not only from the law firms' spreadsheets.
- 02
Comparable over time
The same structure every cycle, so provisions and strategy can be tracked and explained.
- 03
Auditable numbers
Every indicator can be traced back to the cases behind it, which matters to auditors and the board.
- 04
A consolidated portfolio view
Consistent criteria for tracking the portfolio and comparing indicators across firms and reporting periods.
Frequently asked questions
- Which data sources do you use?
- The company's and law firms' case lists, the case files themselves and public court data where available.
- Do you replace our law firms?
- No. LexNexo does not practise law; the indicators help the legal department manage and compare its firms.
- Do you support insolvency administrators?
- Yes. We organise claim filings, reconcile claims against available records and prepare data supporting the creditor list. Legal assessment, claim classification and decisions remain with the legally responsible professionals and the court.
- How do the indicators support provisioning?
- Outcome and value indicators by case group support review by finance, legal and audit teams. Provisioning decisions and accounting assumptions remain with the responsible teams.
- How often is the portfolio refreshed?
- Monthly or quarterly, depending on volume and the cycle agreed with the legal department.
- How is it charged?
- As a subscription by portfolio size, after an initial structuring project with a fixed scope.
Contact
Tell us about the portfolio.
Share the approximate number of cases and where the data sits, and we reply with an initial reading and a written proposal.